CMMC Audit Findings: Common PACS Gaps and How to Fix Them

Addressing Physical Access Control Gaps in CMMC Audits

During Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) assessments, physical access control systems (PACS) often introduce unexpected findings. Assessors evaluate physical security controls under NIST SP 800-171 Requirement 3.10 to ensure physical perimeter integrity. While defense contractors frequently focus on network firewalls and endpoint security, misconfigured physical security infrastructure can delay certification or reduce Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) scores.

Four Frequent PACS Findings and Their Real Costs

Assessors routinely document four recurring physical security gaps during formal evaluations:

Practical Engineering Fixes for PACS Remediation

Remediating these audit findings requires structured system maintenance routines and strict administrative controls:

System Hardening for Defense Industrial Base Facilities

Remediating physical access control gaps before formal CMMC assessment prevents costly delays and project halts. Blue Violet Security, LLC delivers physical security hardening, configuration remediation, and infrastructure designs designed to support CMMC Level 2 and NIST SP 800-171 physical security requirements. Schedule a Consultation with our federal compliance specialists to assess your PACS configuration and audit readiness.

This content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Compliance requirements and regulations are subject to change. Blue Violet Security, LLC recommends consulting with appropriate legal and regulatory counsel before making compliance determinations.